manuscript under consideration nature communicationsnfl players with achilles injuries

rev2023.3.3.43278. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. The process by which content is created. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Titles and abstracts in particular should be written in language that will be readily intelligible to any scientist. Although suggestions can be made by the authors, the final decision regarding the positioning and grouping of such structures rests with the editorial team. 9.3 weeks. Commercial suppliers of reagents or instrumentation should be identified only when the source is critical to the outcome of the experiments. 9! (major revision)6 (revision)3 (Covid-19) 3. Road infrastructure plays a critical role in the support and development of the Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS) paradigm. Cookie Notice This integrated preprint deposition service will hopefully make it easier, and thus more likely, for our authors to share their results early. 2011 1 . Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes publisher 14.0 days to publish the accepted manuscript online. Submission toNature Communicationsis taken to imply that there is no significant overlap between the submitted manuscript and any other papers from the same authors under consideration or in press elsewhere. 2017-07-13. Languages English Espaol Portugus Research Creative My Account Submit My Manuscript Unless it is just rejected by an editor. Cambrian lobopodians and extant onychophorans provide new insights into early cephalization in Panarthropoda. They should not be flattened, compressed, converted or saved as bitmaps, jpegs or other non-vector file types. When possible, we prefer to use original digital figures to ensure the highest-quality reproduction in the journal. But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". Non-corresponding authors do not have to link their ORCID but are encouraged to do so. Labelling must be of sufficient size and contrast to be readable, even after appropriate reduction. What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? Today we take one more step by offering an integrated preprint deposition. The dot pattern on a laser print often creates a moir pattern when scanned. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. One- or two-column format figures are required. Call for papers: Applied. Units should have a single space between the number and the unit, and follow SI nomenclature (for example, ms rather than msec) or the nomenclature common to a particular field. A competing interests statement is required for all content of the journal. All Reviewers Assigned : Nature Communications revised manuscript: What does it means? Isolated mass and percent yields should be reported at the end of each protocol. Article titles should be in Roman text, only the first word of the title should have an initial capital and the title should be written exactly as it appears in the work cited, ending with a full stop. In order to further promote the practice of preprinting, Nature Communications launched an initiative in 2017 that allowed authors to list the preprints of papers hosted on any platform, and undergoing peer review at our journal, on our Under Consideration web page. Roadside Units (RSUs), equipped with vehicular communication capabilities, traffic radars, cameras, and other sensors, can provide a multitude of vehicular services and enhance the cooperative perception of vehicles on the road, leading to increased road . We reserve the right to decline publication of a paper even after it has been accepted if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems with the scientific content or violations of our publishing policies. Please see our brief guide to manuscript submission in PDF format for an overview of key information on submitting primary research for publication in Nature Communications. At present, the In Review opt-in is available for submissions received via the Nature Communications portal, but not to authors transferring their paper from another Nature Research journal. For more information, please see our Answer (1 of 7): Most submissions are rejected by editors without review, and this should be fast - perhaps, two weeks (?). except at the start of a sentence). [CDATA[// > But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". Please note that manuscripts transferred to Scientific Reports must satisfy the policy requirements outlined here before being assigned to an editor. Thousands should be separated by commas (1,000). Where unavoidable, abbreviations should be defined in the text or legends at their first occurrence, and abbreviations should be used thereafter. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. Did this satellite streak past the Hubble Space Telescope so close that it was out of focus? Supplementary Information should be combined and supplied as a separate file, preferably in Word format. Tables that include statistical analysis of data should describe their standards of error analysis and ranges in a table legend. Follow this link for further information on the review process and how editors make decisions. Authors are encouraged to consider the needs of colourblind readers (a substantial minority of the male population) when choosing colours for figures. I have a revised manuscript which I submitted to Nature Communications. A fast and accurate SNP detection algorithm for next-generation sequencing data. Evolving our support for early sharing. Figure lettering should be in a clear, sans-serif typeface (for example, Helvetica); if possible, the same typeface in approximately the same font size should be used for all figures in a paper. Rapid publication can accelerate the dissemination of findings . {"http:\/\/capitadiscovery.co.uk\/lincoln-ac\/items\/eds\/edsdoj\/edsdoj.04acf6765a1f4decb3eb413b2f69f1d9.rdf":{"http:\/\/prism.talis.com\/schema#recordType":[{"type . Figures that do not meet these standards will not reproduce well and may delay publication until we receive high-resolution images. Please submit electronic files at acceptance and include a clear and concise legend explaining the image. Safety hazards posed by reagents or protocols should be identified clearly. What happen if the reviewer reject, but the editor give major revision? How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? To assist with the peer review process, figures and tables may be included within the manuscript text. is still under consideration, Handbook: Keep Calm And Wait: A Guide To Understanding Journal Statuses. 3(Oxford Univ. LaTeX submission must contain all references within the manuscript .tex file itself (see above TeX/LaTeX section for more details). Whether or not reviewers have accepted the invitation is usually confidential information available only to journal staff. Does anyone have any ideas? We recommend that authors refer to our double-blind peer review guidelines when preparing a double-blind peer review manuscript. (Abstracts or unrefereed web preprints do not compromise novelty). Nature Research, the portfolio of our sister journals, has long supported preprint deposition of the originally submitted version of manuscripts, and actively encourages it since last year. on 14 Oct, 2021, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Synthesis of chiral TiO nanofibre with electron transition-based optical activity. As part of our efforts to improve transparency in authorship, we request that all corresponding authors of published papers provide their Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID) ID, before resubmitting the final version of the manuscript. Please do not submit revisions as new manuscripts. Authors who need help understanding our data sharing policies, help finding a suitable data repository, or help organising and sharing research data can access our Author Support portal for additional guidance. Thank you for your question. Follow this link for information about the different types of contributions, along with their length and figure limits. Experimental protocols that describe the synthesis of new compounds should be included. We do, however, support the posting of preprints. If the manuscript includes personal communications, please provide a written statement of permission from any person who is quoted. Must lactose-free milk be ultra-pasteurized? Manuscript under editorial consideration in Nature Reviews Neuroscience Abstract Converging evidence suggests that each parahippocampal-hippocampal sub-region contributes uniquely to the encoding, consolidation and retrieval of declarative memories, yet their precise roles remain elusive. References should be numbered sequentially first throughout the text, then in tables, followed by figures and, finally, boxes; that is, references that only appear in tables, figures or boxes should be last in the reference list. While the word preprint might sound archaic in a digitally-led world, the need for early sharing and discovery of results has never been greater, particularly at a time when a pandemic is sweeping the globe. Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. 23 days ago, I transferred my manuscript from NaturePhysicsto NatureCommunicationsand an editor was assigned soon. Yet contemporaries with first-hand experience of the new colonial societies in process of formation on the other side of the Atlantic were in no doubt that they deviated in important . 2002 File sizes should be as small as possible, with a maximum size of 30 MB, so that they can be downloaded quickly. In addition, many are not native English speakers. Consideration should also be given to the patient's potential sense of embarrassment in relation to their symptoms and the impact of complex perianal fistulas on different aspects of life, including relationships, social life and work/professional . But, after that, the status still displays "Manuscript under consideration" for 23 days. [CDATA[// >